As of December 31, 2014, I retired from full-time teaching in Humboldt State University's Department of History. While this website will remain online, it is no longer maintained.

History 110 - Dr. Gayle Olson-Raymer

Founding Mothers: The Road to Seneca Falls

Drawing of colonial women working in the home

"Woman is a slave, from the cradle to the grave," wrote Ernestine Rose,Third National Women's Rights Convention, September 1852. How does this painting illustrate this quote?

The reality is, we know very little about the women of colonial America, especially the ordinary women. Because most did not read or write, women rarely left behind any information about their lives. We know a bit more about what some people have called the "Founding Mothers" - the wives of famous men - because they were literate and engaged in correspondence with their husbands. Only recently have historians begun to look at the lives both ordinary and extraordinary women.


Discussion Goals

  1. To learn some basic facts about the daily lives and formal roles of colonial women.
  2. To discuss the roles of American women during the Revolutionary War.
  3. To understand how the circumstances and consequences of the Revolutionary War changed the lives and roles of American women.
  4. To determine how and why a few American women took the path to Seneca Falls.

Discussion Goal #1: To learn some basic facts about the daily lives and formal roles of colonial women

Although Blackstone’s Commentaries on the Laws of England was not published until 1765, the principles he described were long embedded in practice and language in both England and her colonies:

"By marriage, the husband and wife are one person in law; that is, the very being or legal existence of the woman is suspended during the marriage, or at least is incorporated and consolidated into that of the husband; under whose wing, protection, and cover, she performs everything."

Essentially, colonial women were "owned" by their husbands. The most obvious emblem of this status was the loss of her name. Married women were not referred to as "Mary Brown" or "Mrs. John Brown," but rather as "John Brown, his wife." Further, unless a husband signed a contract prior to marriage, a wife could neither own nor acquire property, nor could she enter into a contract or write a will.

While we know very little about the lives of southern and middle colony women in early America, we do have some information about women in colonial New England, most prominently the brief “Valedictory and Monitory Writings” of Sarah Goodhue, the captivity narratives - especially those of Mary Rowlandson and Elizabeth Hanson, the poetry of Anne Bradstreet, and more recently, we have the diary of Martha Ballard who wrote about her life at the beginning of the Revolutionary period until her death in 1812.

These sources alone are not enough to tell us the story of colonial women. So, historians have had to search for evidence of women’s lives that is buried in sermons, account books, probate inventories, genealogies, church records, private records, paintings, embroideries, gravestones, and the private papers of husbands and sons. These sources illustrate one primary fact - women - both rich and poor - lived in a gendered world defined by certain truths:Painting of a colonial family -

And what do these sources tell us about the daily lives and what was expected from colonial women? They spent their days:

They also had some Colonial worman working in kitchenimportant economic considerations that contributed to the household such as:

Work for pay was rare, but some women were busy

Married women had several important and expected roles:

Discussion Goal #2: To discuss the roles of American women during the Revolutionary War

What is often missing from the tales we tell about war in early America is the women's perspective and the roles they play during these tumultuous times. If we look at the lives of our Revolutionary Mothers - the title of Carol Berkin's great book- we get an especially clear idea of how they fared during wartime. And in exploring their lives and roles, we are forced to see the war through an unromantic lens - a lens in which violence plays a huge role in the lives of women, in which families are torn apart by chaos and death, homes and crops are destroyed, women are raped, and many families suffer from hunger, dislocation, and in some cases, exile from their Woodcut of a Daughter of Liberty during the Revolutionary Warhomeland.

As Carol Berkin tells us in Revolutionary Mothers, for eight years the Revolutionary War "blurred the lines between battlefield and home front" and in so doing, propelled women into the center of the violent conflict. So, just what did women do during the Revolution?


Discussion Goal #3: To understand how the circumstances and consequences of the Revolutionary War changed the lives and roles of American women

Before and during the war, women entered a sphere largely unfamiliar to them - the world of politics.  Their daily choices before the war - to buy or drink  imported tea or refuse it, to buy English cloth or weave their own, to shop at loyalist stores or avoid them - became political acts. Thus, during the war, rich and poor women continued to perform their traditional duties, but performed them under untraditional circumstances. 

Despite Painting of a woman fighting in the Revolutionary Warthis change and the manner in which women easily moved into the political sphere and assumed many of the male roles required by the war, after the war virtually no one suggested formalizing the role of women in politics or allowing them to continue performing any untraditional tasks. In fact, most women seemed eager to return to the family roles they had known in more peaceful times.

Indeed, the extraordinary challenges they assumed in wartime had been met "only to preserve the survival of the ordinary." (Berkin, xvii)  Most women returned to their customary activities after the war. It was, as if "The war for independence allowed, and often propelled, these women to step out of their traditional female roles for the briefest  of moments and to perform deeds that surprised them perhaps as much as they surprised others." (Berkin, 146)


Discussion Goal #4: To determine how and why a few American women took the path to Seneca Falls

Although radical changes in gender ideology and gender roles for most women did not change after the war's end, the Revolution did lend what Carol Berkin describes as a "legitimacy to new ideas about women's capacities and their proper roles." Such thinking led some individuals to offer a few new opportunities for some women and encouraged postwar intellectuals to reinterpret the traditional roles of women in ways that eventually led to change.

Specifically, a small group of intellectuals engaged in a lively debate after the war about what changes might be necessary in the New Republic. Woodcut of woman speaking at Seneca Falls Convention 1848Such people were, of course, among a small group of elite women and men who addressed changes in the lives of their racial and social classes - not in the lives of ordinary women or women of color. These women formed the earliest debates about the role of women in colonial society and as such, focused on the following:

Despite the debates, 60 years after the Revolutionary War, the following had occurred:

Thus, it is sad but not surprising that women still had few legal rights. This fact led a group of 300 committed women - and a few men - to gather at Seneca Falls in 1848. About 100 people - 68 women and 32 men - decided to write and endorse a declaration that would, in the words of Susan B. Anthony, serve as the "grand basis for attaining the civil, social, political, and religious rights of women."

At a time when traditional roles for women were still very much in place, the Convention and the resulting Declaration of Sentiments caused much controversy. Written in the same language as the Declaration of Independence, the Declaration of Sentiments was meant to illustrate that women still had a long way to go if they were to be considered equal citizens in the new nation.

As an essay at the Human Rights and Social Justice Writing Center states:

"Elizabeth Cady Stanton ... followed the style and wording of the Declaration of Independence closely. Thomas Jefferson wrote, 'We hold these truths to be self evident that all men are created equal.' Copy of first sentence in The Declaration of SentimentsElizabeth Cady Stanton edited this same sentence to say that all men and women are created equal. Whereas the Declaration of Independence outlines the 'patient sufferance of the colonies', the Declaration of Sentiments outlines the 'patient sufferance of women under this government.' The Declaration of Independence aims its grievances at the King of England and addresses him by saying things such as 'He has obstructed the Administration of Justice' and 'He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly.' The Declaration of Sentiments uses this same style, but the 'He' is not used to address the King, but male oppressors. The Declaration of Sentiments mimics the style used in the Declaration of Independence to highlight the fact that women are American citizens."

Many people respected the courage and abilities behind the Sentiments, but were unwilling to abandon conventional mindsets. An article in the Oneida Whig published soon after the convention described the document as "the most shocking and unnatural event ever recorded in the history of womanity." Many newspapers insisted that the Declaration was drafted at the expense of women's more appropriate duties.

Even many supporters of women's rights believed the Declaration's endorsement of women's suffrage would hinder the small women's rights movement and cause it to lose much needed public support.


Conclusions
Founding Mothers:  The Road to Seneca Falls

  1. Women in colonial America lived a highly gendered life in which they were completely beholden to their husbands and were expected to be a good Christian helpmate, housewife, mother, neighbor, deputy husband, consort, and mistress.
  2. Before and during the Revolutionary War, women entered a sphere largely unfamiliar to them - the world of politics.  Their daily choices before the war - to buy or drink imported tea or refuse it, to buy English cloth or weave their own, to shop at loyalist stores or avoid them - became political acts.
  3. The lives of women, both rich and poor, changed dramatically before and during the Revolutionary War as women performed their traditional duties and roles within untraditional settings, and assumed many new roles previously provided by their husbands and sons.
  4. Women’s participation in the war provided proof that the colonial certitude of women being morally and intellectually inferior to men was incorrect.
  5. Despite the assumption of new roles, the manner in which women easily moved into the political sphere, and the certainty that women were morally and intellectually equal to men, after the war virtually no one suggested formalizing the role of women in politics or allowing them to continue performing any untraditional tasks.
  6. The extraordinary challenges women assumed in wartime appeared to have occurred only so that they could return to their ordinary family roles in times of peace.
  7. The “women’s debate” of the postwar era ended by narrowing, rather than expanding, the women’s sphere by focusing women’s emotional and intellectual energies within the small circle of the home and domesticity.
  8. Over 60 years after the end of the Revolutionary War, this narrow definition of women’s roles in the world at large led a small group of determined women to come together and advocate for change at Seneca Falls. It took, however, another 71 years before their list of changes were met!